Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Lack of battery energy storage standards threaten wind and solar projects, says GCUBE

By Nic Sharpley | May 9, 2013

As pressure placed on cutting the cost of clean energy increases, savings must not be founGCubed at the expense of an ongoing investment in critical design and construction specifications, the development and implementation of new industry standards, and the evolution of established checks.  That is according to GCube Insurance Services, the leading provider of insurance services for renewable energy projects.

The contention comes at a critical time for the North American wind and solar markets, as the use of energy storage facilities gains momentum, despite the high profile battery fire at a small wind farm in 2012.  The total loss to property and the interruption of business is in the vicinity of $30 to $50 million, much of which is addressed by insurance.

While the exact cause of the fire is still under investigation, many expect the precise details of the incident will remain unknown.

However, what has quickly become apparent is that while it may never be clear exactly how the fire started, the incident went undetected and destroyed the building and its contents because there was no fire detection, alarm and suppression system.

“Given the ambitions by owners and operators to install and operate similar energy storage devices to help better manage the flow of electricity to the grid, this finding is particularly significant,” says John McLane, President, GCube Insurance Services, Inc.

“When managed, maintained, and operated effectively, energy storage technology presents a clear and growing opportunity for the wind and solar energy markets.  And, despite the record size of the insurance claim, it’s a technology that we will continue to support and back,” he added.

“However, in order to ensure that such technology remains both viable and effective, an established system of procedures and routine checks need to be regularly carried out, with the system carefully monitored, in order to help mitigate against future industry loss.”

According to GCube, while the establishment and development of these standards will require initial industry investment, without further action, future growth of renewable energy could be further curtailed if there is a repeat of this event.

Fraser McLachlan, CEO, GCube Underwriting Ltd., added, “Make no mistake, our insurance policies are in place to help enhance and protect all forms of renewable energy assets.  A fundamental part of this business is therefore about supporting the industry and paying claims.”

“While the battery fire loss was large and unexpected, that is the very nature of our business.  It’s imperative that we work directly with the market to establish and drive new industry standards, over and above simply having the ability to write a large check.”

With over 25 years of experience, GCube currently safeguards and protects over 30,000 MW of renewable energy assets currently in operation and under construction around the world.  To date, its experienced, in-house team has paid out in excess of $200 million in claims.

In 2012, GCube secured $175 million in additional construction underwriting capacity to assist the development and evolution of the emerging biomass and geothermal energy markets.

This, combined with a significant partnership deal struck in 2012 with Munich Re, has seen the business open up new insurance lines and enhance its existing dedicated renewable energy insurance offerings.

GCube
www.gcube-insurance.com

 


Filed Under: Insurance, News
Tagged With: GCube
 

Comments

  1. Lawrence Kelley says

    May 10, 2013 at 8:03 am

    This seems like an opportunity for respected North American engineering stardards orgs. like IEEE, ASME, AWEA, NFPA, Intertek, UL, CSA, Factory Mutual and ANSI to all work together with the battery industry and jointly develop fire safety standards. However, considering how much work’s already been done on this in Germany by companies like Vestas, I suspect adoption / translation of existing German / DIN best-practices or EU Directives may simplify / shortcut the work. If anyone wishes to pay me for the translation, I’m available… 🙂 Best, – Larry / Clifton Park, New York

Related Articles Read More >

Richardson Electronics to deliver pitch energy modules to TransAlta wind fleets
Equinor halts work on Empire Wind offshore project after federal government order
ARESCA wants input on offshore wind standards
US wind market has worst install year since 2013

Podcasts

Wind Spotlight: Looking back at a year of Thrive with ZF Wind Power
See More >

Windpower Engineering & Development Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Browse the most current issue of Windpower Engineering & Development and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading wind power engineering magazine today.

Windpower Engineering & Development
  • Wind Articles
  • Solar Power World
  • Subscribe to Windpower Engineering
  • About Us/Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising

Search Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe