The weighted cost of capital significantly varies across the European Union, amounting to 3.5% in Germany and 1% in Greece in 2014. These are the findings of the DiaCore project, funded by the Executive Agency for Small and Medium Enterprises (EASME).
This research project was led by Ecofys, Fraunhofer ISI, eclareon, EPU-NTUA, TU Wien, and LEI. The project team is the first to estimate the costs of capital for onshore wind energy projects across the 28 EU Member States.
With Directive 2009/28/EC, the European Parliament and Council have laid the grounds for the policy framework for renewable energy sources (RES) until 2020. DiaCore’s mission is to facilitate convergence in RES support across the EU and enhance investments, cooperation, and coordination.

The weighted average cost of capital in the 28 EU member states (Source: Ecofys et al. 2016)
The European Union has set itself a binding target of “at least” 20% renewable energy in final energy consumption by 2020. To meet this target, 60 to 70 billion euros annual investments are needed. Renewable energy technologies are capital-intensive, so the cost of capital plays an important role in investment decisions and costs of target achievement.
The cost of capital is determined by the cost of debt and the cost of equity. In 2014, the cost of equity for onshore wind projects ranged between 6% (in Germany) and more than 15% in Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovenia. The cost of debt varied between 1.8% in Germany and 12.6% in Greece. This results in weighted average cost of capital (WACC) ranging from 3.5 to 12%.
“There is a growing gap among EU Member States on the financing of renewable energy projects,” said Ecofys Principal Consultant, David de Jager. “From the very start of a project, project developers in the EU do not face the same financing conditions. Why does the cost of capital vary so much? Because of the risks for investors: if an investment is risky, the cost of capital increases.”
Based on interviews with more than 110 banks and project developers in the EU, the consortium finds that next to the generic country risk, the main risk for investors in renewable energy is the policy-induced risk — hence the design and the reliability of renewable energy support. Unstable policies, such as sudden retroactive changes, automatically increase the cost of reaching renewable energy targets.
Calculations based on the Green X Model show that if all countries would have the same renewable energy policy risk profile as the best in class, the EU Member States could reduce the policy costs for wind onshore by more than 15%. A reduced country risk could lead to greater savings.
The report can be downloaded at the DiaCore webpage.
DiaCore
www.diacore,eu
Filed Under: News