Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Wind software simplifies simulations of wind blades fast

By Kathie Zipp | May 24, 2012

The top images present the 3D mesh in the FEA program in its global view (white) and a close up of its edge. The bottom 2D mesh was generated in the VABS program.

Variation Asymptotical Beam Sectional Analysis (VABS) is an efficient high-fidelity cross-sectional analysis program and a unique tool capable of realistic modeling of initially curved and twisted anisotropic beams (blades on wind turbines and helicopters) with arbitrary sectional topology and materials. The software serves as a link between 3D solid and 1D beam models in that it is capable of reducing an original 3D structure to a beam model, and with the information obtained by 1D analysis, recovering the 3D field quantities, including displacements, and stress and strain over the cross-section of the beam.

The software has recently been extended to handle multiphysics problems including thermal-hygro, piezoelectric (coupling effects between electric and mechanical fields), piezomagnetic (coupling effects between magnetic and mechanical fields), pyro (coupling effects between thermal and electric-magnetic fields), and any combination between these physics fields in addition to the traditional mechanical analysis.

Multiphysics analysis mainly deals with the behavior of engineering structures composed of smart materials working under multiple physical fields: mechanical, thermal, electric, and magnetic. Smart materials are those that exhibit a coupling between multiple physical domains. Piezoelectrics are examples of smart materials in that they create a conversion interface between electrical and mechanical energy. Structures composed of these smart materials, which often function as actuators and sensors, are often called “smart structures”. Applications of smart structures include vibration suppression, shape control of composite plates, and aeroelastic stability augmentation. For example, embedded or surface-bonded smart actuators on a wind-turbine blade can induce an airfoil camber change that in turn varies the distribution of lift.

Although a direct analysis of composite beam structures is possible, it is computationally expensive even with advanced supercomputers. By using beam theory, the computational cost is typically several orders of magnitude less in comparison with full 3D analysis. However, one of the major barriers of smart-structure technology is the lack of reliable smart systems mathematical modeling and analysis. This barrier is caused by the difficulty of modeling coupling effects and the anisotropic and heterogeneous nature of composite materials.


Based on a powerful mathematical tool, the variatonal-asymptotic method (VAM) pioneered by Dr. Berdichevsky, a series of composite-beam models are constructed for efficient high-fidelity multiphysics beam analysis. Unlike many other beam modeling methods, the present work does not rely on any a priori kinematic assumptions which cannot handle complex geometry and significant heterogeneity over the cross-section of the beam. Moreover, it is difficult to make this kind of assumption for multiphysics analysis due to coupling effects. The newly developed beam models have been implemented into VABS, which will released with the new version VABS.

The following example shows that the current VABS has the ability to analyze a realistic blade structure at an affordable computational cost. A cantilevered beam with NACA2412 airfoil under thermal loading is used in this case. Results are compared with those obtained by a highly regarded 3D FEA code. From A comparison of stresses, it is observed that the predictions of VABS Multiphysics have excellent agreement with results from the 3D FEA code, along two comparison paths shown in the airfoil cross section. The computational efficiency of the two models is now shown.

Comparing the meshes shows those used in the 3D FEA and VABS calculations. Both analysis were run on a computing server with AMD Opteron Processor 6174 2020 GHz(2 processors) and 128 GM RAM. The 3D FEA took 3 hours, 5 minutes, and 23 seconds to finish the calculation, while only 37 seconds for VABS analysis. The software comes from AnalySwift, analyswift.com. WPE

By: Qi Wang, Structural Analyst at NREL, www.NREL.gov


Filed Under: Software

 

About The Author

Kathie Zipp

Related Articles Read More >

Ocean Winds adopts maintenance management services from Shoreline Winds for global wind portfolio
Alaska’s largest wind farm incorporates Emerson’s operations software
Power performance testing? Utilize the ease and efficiency of lidar
Whatever the weather: Optimize asset performance by understanding wind resource, not relying on it

Podcasts

Wind Spotlight: Looking back at a year of Thrive with ZF Wind Power
See More >

Windpower Engineering & Development Digital Edition Archive

Digital Edition

Explore the full archive of digital issues of Windpower Engineering & Development, presented in a high-quality, user-friendly format. Access current and past editions, clip, share, and download valuable content from the industry’s leading wind power engineering resource.

Windpower Engineering & Development
  • Wind Articles
  • Solar Power World
  • Subscribe to Windpower Engineering
  • About Us/Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising

Search Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe