Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Two-blade, 3.6 MW turbine boast lower costs and lighter weights

By Nic Sharpley | December 1, 2014

Envision says the rotor length of its E128 can be customized to the site by adapting the blade extensions to meet site-specific requirements.

Envision says the rotor length of its E128 can be customized to the site by adapting the blade extensions to meet site-specific requirements.

It can take years to for a wind-turbine idea to become an energy producing machine. For Denmark based Envision Energy (www.project-gc1.com) however, it took less than two year to get its two bladed, partial-pitch turbine up and generating power. Company aerodynamic engineer Kristian Godsk made the comments and more at the recent Sandia Blade Workshop. He says the design is the first of its kind and suggests that its features can cut 10% off the capital expenditure for offshore turbines.

The E128-3.6 PP 2B turbine takes most of its advantages from the two-blade design. For instance, having just one fewer blade than a convention three-blade turbine reduces production costs, and that lightens the up-tower mass which means the tower can weigh less making it easier to transport and erect. Furthermore, the two-blade design allows lifting the blade and nacelle at once, further cutting construction costs.

And there are operational advantages. For instance, the two blade rotor can be parked in a horizontal position in high wind or shear and the blade holds itself horizontal. Envision says the design is fit for sites with extreme-force winds.

Innovation in the rotor includes the fixed length, 22m center portion called the extender. The outer blade lengths pitch independently of the center section and provide the source for the partial-pitch reference. Although the extender has a fixed length, it allows customizing the rotor length by adjusting the tip or blade length as needed for a site’s prevailing wind speeds. Hence, low-wind speeds would allow longer tips for a greater swept area, and shorter tips for higher speeds.

Transformers and converters are mounted in enclosures at the base of the tower, not in the nacelle. That makes them easier to maintain when offshore. Also interesting is that the main shaft is made of carbon fiber and the flex in the shaft damps some of its loads, says Godsk.

In the most violent storm to sweep the site, wind hit 51 m/s, enough to break a cup off the turbine’s anemometer. But the controls positioned the turbine sideways to the high wind so it suffered no damage. The prototype has been running in Denmark since 2012. WPE


Filed Under: Featured, News, Turbines
Tagged With: envisionenergy
 

Comments

  1. Robert Bullard, P. E. says

    December 2, 2014 at 10:14 am

    While the described benefits are legion, mostly well established historically, the main contrary issue (load imbalance) and its many undesirable impacts would seem to continue to exist, even for the off-shore siting with a more amenable vertical wind force distribution compared to most terrestrial sites.

  2. George Fleming says

    December 1, 2014 at 11:17 pm

    Good article. This looks like a fine turbine. I would like to know about the drive train. There is no information on the company website. Is it a geared turbine? The large diameter of the nacelle seems to indicate direct drive.

  3. Stephen Dewar says

    December 1, 2014 at 5:59 pm

    Hello to Kristian, Lars and Peter and congratulations to all. This looks terrific. If you decide you want to try a tubercle airfoil on this beauty get in touch.
    Stephen

Related Articles Read More >

Trump admin ‘pauses’ leases for five offshore wind projects already under construction
US to install 36% more wind turbines in 2025 than previous year
Federal judge says Trump’s offshore wind blockade is illegal
LS Power acquires BP Wind Energy North America onshore wind business

Podcasts

Wind Spotlight: Looking back at a year of Thrive with ZF Wind Power
See More >

Windpower Engineering & Development Digital Edition Archive

Digital Edition

Explore the full archive of digital issues of Windpower Engineering & Development, presented in a high-quality, user-friendly format. Access current and past editions, clip, share, and download valuable content from the industry’s leading wind power engineering resource.

Windpower Engineering & Development
  • Wind Articles
  • Solar Power World
  • Subscribe to Windpower Engineering
  • About Us/Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising

Search Windpower Engineering & Development

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Most recent posts
    • News
    • Featured
  • Resources
    • Digital issues
    • Podcasts
    • Suppliers
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • Videos
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe